Does horizontal transmission invalidate cultural phylogenies?
Greenhill, S.J., Currie, T.E., & Gray, R.D. (2009). Does horizontal transmission invalidate cultural phylogenies? Proceedings of the Royal Society B, Biological Sciences.
Phylogenetic methods have recently been applied to studies of cultural evolution. However, it has been claimed that the large amount of horizontal transmission that sometimes occurs between cultural groups invalidates the use of these methods. Here, we use a natural model of linguistic evolution to simulate borrowing between languages. The results show that tree topologies constructed with Bayesian phylogenetic methods are robust to realistic levels of borrowing. Inferences about divergence dates are slightly less robust and show a tendency to underestimate dates. Our results demonstrate that realistic levels of reticulation between cultures do not invalidate a phylogenetic approach to cultural and linguistic evolution.
Sorry, there are no files attached to this publication yet
- Does horizontal transmission invalidate cultural phylogenies?
- The Pleasures and Perils of Darwinizing Culture (with phylogenies)
- How Accurate and Robust Are the Phylogenetic Estimates of Austronesian Language Relationships?
- Language Phylogenies Reveal Expansion Pulses and Pauses in Pacific Settlement
- On the shape and fabric of human history
- Testing Population Dispersal Hypotheses: Pacific Settlement, Phylogenetic Trees, and Austronesian Languages
- Austronesian language phylogenies: myths and misconceptions about Bayesian computational methods
- Matrilocal residence is ancestral in Austronesian societies
- The Austronesian Basic Vocabulary Database: From Bioinformatics to Lexomics
- Language trees support the express-train sequence of Austronesian expansion